Forums > General Industry > Dis/Prove: Ugly photographers have high standards
Search

Photographer

Digital Emulsion

Posts: 345

Brooklyn, Indiana, US

Do we have a consensus?

Jun 07 06 11:08 pm Link

Photographer

Jim Ball

Posts: 17632

Frontenac, Kansas, US

Digital Emulsion wrote:
Do we have a consensus?

Would the invers of this imply that good looking photographers have low standards?

Jun 07 06 11:11 pm Link

Photographer

Digital Emulsion

Posts: 345

Brooklyn, Indiana, US

Jim Ball wrote:
Would the invers of this imply that good looking photographers have low standards?

no, contrapositive will be: having low standards means you have good looks.

Jun 07 06 11:14 pm Link

Search