|
Forums >
General Industry >
Worst Tattoo on a Model or Celeb
Outside of the singer Eve ( and those tattoos on her breasts) what is the worst tattoo on a model or celeb in your view? May 29 06 06:31 pm Link Garry k wrote: mike tyson comes to mind May 29 06 06:33 pm Link That black x or cross on Angelina Jolie's lower abdomen... it always disturbed me. For all kind of celebrity tattoos check 'em here: http://www.vanishingtattoo.com/celebrity_tattoos.htm May 29 06 06:33 pm Link I say all celebs/models with tattos May 29 06 06:39 pm Link i guess my own little opinion, but i've always thought tattoos on the breasts were a bad idea. and yeah that angelina tattoo is just umm, just wrong. May 29 06 06:41 pm Link I luv all of angelina's tats. May 29 06 06:44 pm Link Mike Tyson but I'm not too familiar with many celebrities. May 29 06 06:45 pm Link  Someone's name- never a good idea.May 29 06 06:46 pm Link CLT wrote: Worst location= face! May 29 06 06:48 pm Link Adrienne Aurora wrote: dem Maori women ( adn men ) might disagree..... May 29 06 06:49 pm Link Garry k wrote: ...and I think this whole thread is based on personal opinion. May 29 06 06:51 pm Link Adrienne Aurora wrote: generally that is what forum discussions are based on ....( personal opinions ) May 29 06 06:54 pm Link Garry k wrote:
May 29 06 06:57 pm Link Adrienne Aurora wrote: U 2 May 29 06 09:01 pm Link ...and no one said dennis rodman??? May 30 06 07:18 pm Link This is the difference between fashion photographers/models and artistic photographers/models, granted the people who pick the tattoos who get something absolutely stupid have a lot of influence on the opinions of others. A great tattoo artist with the right talent and ideas does great work, and inks a high caliber work of art. Unfortunately, the masses don't believe in the credo I saw in my first tattoo studio "a good tattoo isn't cheap or fast, and a cheap and fast tattoo is never good." There is art for the sake of art and tattoos for the sake of tattoos ... anything under 2 hours of GOOD work is a waste of skin, ink, and the tattoo artist's time and talent no matter who it's on. Nemi May 30 06 07:24 pm Link Nemesis73 wrote: Wow, thats a pretty ignorant statement. Most of these replies are, with exception of the name tattoos. May 30 06 08:38 pm Link any, if god, the green men, or darwins theory wanted us covered in signs, we would be at birth. May 30 06 08:42 pm Link My tattoo, which is less than a half inch square, and on my foot, took less than ten minutes, and means a lot to me. Does it make it a bad one? May 30 06 08:44 pm Link Any which show. May 30 06 08:44 pm Link Johnny Depp obviously thought "Winona Forever" was bad when he had it changed to "Wino Forever" My personal favorite "save" May 30 06 08:51 pm Link James Graham wrote: That's exactly what came to mind, why didn't he change it to "Win Forever" or something! May 30 06 08:54 pm Link Doug Mackay DMP wrote: Doug is easy to find at a party... he's the naked guy covered in goo with a cord hanging out of his bellybutton... he also has a disproportionately large head and no teeth... May 30 06 08:55 pm Link "Wino" is WAY better... May 30 06 08:56 pm Link The ones that are meaningless, the ones that are meant to say "hey look I got a tattoo" yet are socially acceptable are the ones that tick me off. I have smaller tattoos but they're symbolic, they have meaning, they represent and reflect who and what I am. People who get the ones everybody else has, waste the artist's time and talent. The artist who did 3 of my pieces absolutely loved me because I kept bringing in ideas out of books and other sources. He absolutely hated doing flash work. As for the comment about being born with what we were meant to have, I feel the same way about breast augmentation and tanning. Nemi May 30 06 09:01 pm Link |
Wow. U smart.
