|
Forums >
General Industry >
If you could only shoot one model ...
If I were to be limited to only one model for the next five years, she'd have to be brilliant, beautiful, young, skinny and want to have my baby (but ignorant about the vasectomy). In truth, I'd rather shoot toothpaste ads than photograph only one model even twice in a row. -Don May 25 06 12:56 pm Link 41 May 25 06 01:04 pm Link I thought we were talking about with a gun. Nevermind  May 25 06 01:07 pm Link Cristal Steverson wrote: MINESMINESMINES!!!! May 25 06 01:21 pm Link Man, I hate when it has to be one model. But I'll answer the question, my way. HA Ha ha, evil laugh. I'd like to shoot Josianne Junkie, because I know for a fact that I can take muli shoots of here in a week and get different stuff, versatility and personality with any style, like a Noami Campbell. Iranian Goddess, similar to Josianne but more towards the raw side. Both are vein in their work, which I luv. Iranian isn't afraid to have fun and give to the lens. I also like the exotic wicked look of this lady. Nederlande, I hope that I spelled her name right. I like her because she is high fashion. The commercial high fashion look that works. Iman, my fanstasy is to have her dress like the X-men's Ororro aka Storm, because she looks more like Storm in the Comics, paticularly the Storm from 1980 the Dark series saga. Exotic, slender body that can jusitfy that custom from the early 80's. She's the 'perfect Storm'. Fetish and gothic wise: Jasmine Worth: Sexy, that's all that I can say. I'd like to get Josianna Junkie and Iranian Goddess on a Gothic fetish shoot because they are both raw. Ok I'm done.  )May 25 06 01:48 pm Link D. Brian Nelson wrote: An openly promiscuous shooter. So, fidelity to toothpaste ads for five years would be easier than fidelity to one model? Sounds you need another muse. Looking forward to our one shoot stand however. May 25 06 01:55 pm Link This changes regularly, but at this moment I would have to say Jennifer Connolly or if on MM then Brittany Markert 54984 May 25 06 01:58 pm Link K Leo wrote: *winks one of my killer eyes at K Leo* hehe...really though if only you were closer...I bet we could make some amazing art...sounds like we'd fit pretty well May 25 06 02:15 pm Link Eric S. wrote: If you pass on Gemma I would pick her up ....Already a supermodel at 16 she is still ascending and will problaby peak by 20-21. If you were shooting her for 5 yrs , my guess is that this would give you almost an exculive on her .. Imagine the commecial oppotunites that would come your way becuase of this ...She is already making millons - and therefor you would prosper as well . May 25 06 02:24 pm Link K Leo wrote: That's the kind of answer I'm looking for. Lots of you threw out names, but you didn't say why ... what traits would keep you interested in shooting the same model for 5 years? May 26 06 12:41 am Link Eric S. wrote: I will pick up Gemma then - she is only 16 and is still ascending > Probably will peak around 19-20 .She has already made millions and I am sure as well for those working with her . A 5 yr stint photographing her would probably mean exclusivitiy as a photographer ..... May 26 06 02:24 am Link Justin Huang wrote: You could just take a regular tall slim model and drive over her head. May 26 06 07:44 am Link nudeartproject wrote: Good answer! Good answer! May 26 06 07:50 am Link Tim Hammond wrote: Female Tim Hammond wrote: Not generally, although at the moment I'm looking for a local slender bald female model with multiple facial piercings (the more the better). May 26 06 07:59 am Link |
