Photographer
SLE Photography
Posts: 68937
Orlando, Florida, US
litlaur wrote:
selling bland clothing with sex, what a novel concept... But porn & fashion will never go together, so models should never be naked because no one will work with them!
Since nudity & porn are exactly the same thing.
Model
Christine
Posts: 1300
Los Angeles, California, US
Photographer
SLE Photography
Posts: 68937
Orlando, Florida, US
Christine Summers wrote:
wow I was being facetious 
Photographer
oldguysrule
Posts: 6129
SLE Photography wrote:
But porn & fashion will never go together, so models should never be naked because no one will work with them!
Since nudity & porn are exactly the same thing. this is the reason for the pursuit of this thread, it appears.
quite honestly, the models here will have enough problems finding a positive response out of a major modelling agency, without being saddled with nudity in their non-existant career histories.
in addition the subjects in this advert are in fact porn stars.
the claim that real models would never do nudity is absurd
the claim that aspiring models (with any real potential) should disrobe for every tog with a dollar and a dream is equally absurd. and don't be pointin to nude work by major models to justify the logic either to justify. there is NO comparison between , for example, Angie Everheart (couldn't keep clothes ON the girl!) and the most successful model on this site... and even at that angie paid for her wayward ways.
the volume, if nothing else, of the whole nudity debate is proof that for all the yakkin this is still a remarkably sexually distraught culture.
*yawn
Photographer
Rick Edwards
Posts: 6185
Wilmington, Delaware, US
...yeah...and the clothes weren't that great either...
Photographer
Brian Egendorf
Posts: 305
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
I doubt that I'd go so far as to try to advertise a product with porn, but most industries know that sex sells in advertising. I've wanted to do a male and female model shoot for lingerie for a while now. But I wanted to focus more on the foreplay leading up to sex, not the sex itself. Victoria's Secrets catalogs are hot because the models are hot, but once you've seen one, you've seen them all, because all it is is models standing around or posing alone. Then need to actually show some male models trying to get into bed with the felmale models. Not porn, just the insinuation that, "this underwear causes instant hornyness in your boyfriend." And have a little male and female intimate contact..
Brian E.
Photographer
StevesPhotography
Posts: 208
Mustang, Oklahoma, US
I am pretty "meh" to the whole thing but I do approve of anything that tweaks the noses of the Fundies.
Photographer
jon mmmayhem
Posts: 8233
Philadelphia, Mississippi, US
StevesPhotography wrote:
I am pretty "meh" to the whole thing but I do approve of anything that tweaks the noses of the Fundies. ![https://www.248am.com/images/fundies.jpg]()
??
Photographer
James Graham
Posts: 741
Brooklyn, New York, US
I was onto these guys months ago.
Bravo for the bold approach, and yeah the "buy this discarded item of clothing now" roll-overs are cool.
Shame it's kinda just bad porn...
Photographer
SKPhoto
Posts: 25784
Newark, California, US
I wonder if she brought an escort?
Photographer
StevesPhotography
Posts: 208
Mustang, Oklahoma, US
jon mmmayhem wrote:
![https://www.248am.com/images/fundies.jpg]()
?? HeeHee
Photographer
J C ModeFotografie
Posts: 14718
Los Angeles, California, US
Demarcus Freeman wrote:
I don't know what they're selling, but it probably already has stains on it.. That's the BEST reply on this thread I've seen so far!
Best Regards,
JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER
Photographer
SLE Photography
Posts: 68937
Orlando, Florida, US
oldguysrule wrote:
this is the reason for the pursuit of this thread, it appears.
quite honestly, the models here will have enough problems finding a positive response out of a major modelling agency, without being saddled with nudity in their non-existant career histories.
in addition the subjects in this advert are in fact porn stars.
the claim that real models would never do nudity is absurd
the claim that aspiring models (with any real potential) should disrobe for every tog with a dollar and a dream is equally absurd. and don't be pointin to nude work by major models to justify the logic either to justify. there is NO comparison between , for example, Angie Everheart (couldn't keep clothes ON the girl!) and the most successful model on this site... and even at that angie paid for her wayward ways.
the volume, if nothing else, of the whole nudity debate is proof that for all the yakkin this is still a remarkably sexually distraught culture.
*yawn First off, I was joking
Secondly, Angie's a BAD example since she refused to do nudity (other than implied) for years till after she was a succesful model & had done a few feature film parts. She always said she wouldn't do it because of her grandmother & as soon as her grandmother passed away Angie was in Playboy.
|
