Forums >
Digital Art and Retouching >
How to tone down a shimmery makeup?
Yesterday I shot a set for a magazine and the MUAs used a very shimmery makeup on a black model. I exposed the images 1 stop under so I wouldn't blow out the highlights from the shimmer, but now after getting them on the computer the model looks as though she has HUGE white spots on her face. Is there a way to fix this? Jun 08 09 07:25 am Link Sounds like you got some of that MAC makeup with the reflective particles. I can't remember the specific material but most MUA ppl know of it and to stay away from it. I got hit by that too once and couldn't use the shots, so will be watching this thread. Jun 08 09 07:29 am Link Go to; Image > Adjustments > selective colour > Whites Then use the slider that says black. It should darken just the whites.. Failing that; Image > Adjustments > Replace Colour Then use the dropper to select the white shimmer colour and darken. I can't see the image but this is how i would tackle it xx Jun 08 09 07:30 am Link TheEighthSin wrote: Technically I'm not supposed to post it because it's going to be for a magazine. I don't know how to edit this by myself though, so I may just have to pay someone. The highlights are so bright they look over exposed even though I under exposed the entire image. I tried what you said to do and it did help a little. I just don't see how this is ever going to be recovered. Jun 08 09 07:35 am Link You MIGHT be able to get away with clone stamping regular skin over it at a very very low opacity...Hard to say again, since we can't see the image. But at least maybe we can give you a few things to try. This might tone down the overall makeup and make it look dull so be careful, but its worth a try! Jun 08 09 07:39 am Link with patch tool remove the excessive sparkles one by one? thats what i would probably do Jun 08 09 07:54 am Link In my experience, I normally do a combination of everything that's been mentioned so far, it really does depend on the photo. I feel your pain though! I had 40+ shots to edit of a model who basically looked radioactive from shimmer pigment crap. Jun 08 09 08:05 am Link Oh and if all else fails, maybe building it all from scratch? Depending on what type of retouching you're doing with the rest of the skin. You may have to re-colour, smooth then put a new skin texture over it. Jun 08 09 08:06 am Link Laura Dark Photography wrote: Was the effect similar to this ? Jun 08 09 08:08 am Link Laura Dark Photography wrote: This sounds like it is from the Titanium Dioxide. It is SPF and is in most drug store make-up. Some lines contain less than others and a good make-up artist not to use this stuff. There are plenty of cosmetic lines without Titanium Dioxide. Jun 08 09 08:23 am Link Real World Images wrote: Jun 08 09 08:47 am Link Laura Dark Photography wrote: it doesnt seem that bad to me, natural highlights and thats all Jun 08 09 08:50 am Link Kat Torgashev wrote: They show up so white though on her dark skin they look overexposed in the full photo. Jun 08 09 08:51 am Link biwa wrote: They have adds for the shimmery make-up. Those photographers managed to get the shot so there must be a way to do it. Jun 08 09 10:04 am Link It CAN be fixed... but its not just a quick easy technique.... it is going to be a combination of things.... and probably a tad time consuming since it is requiring magazine quality. Jun 09 09 08:57 am Link this could have been saved if the photographer and MUA have discussed before the shoot what the photographer wanted to achieve. This way the MUA know how to strategize his/her makeup both techniques and products. Jun 09 09 10:41 am Link I was just always lazy and used the brush at a 10-20% opacity and eye dropper the surrounding skin tones and paint over until satisfied... Just my $0.2 Jun 09 09 11:00 am Link What's done is done. I like the aforementioned post regarding sampling nearby colors via a 3x3 sampling option and brush on Darken mode on an empty transparency layer and adjust layer opacity to taste. You've learnt something from this experience and that is a good thing. Calvy Tran wrote: Jun 10 09 10:21 pm Link |