|
Forums >
General Industry >
Glamourshots....????
Does anyone else think they overdo their editing? I wish they used more blending techniques, I keep seeing stuff that looks like smudge tool May 06 06 05:42 am Link Mall store + $20 = photoshop action, not art. May 06 06 12:41 pm Link Richard Tallent wrote: oh i know, but for just a few extra steps they could do so much more.. May 07 06 02:31 pm Link My friends family spent 2000 dollars at glamour shots...and they edited out all their freckles. It's creepy.  May 07 06 02:55 pm Link Richard Tallent wrote: Glamour Shots is expensive! Years ago, when I didn't know any better, I went there for some pictures of myself. For my $20.00 (and this was years ago, it may have been more than $20), all I got were the proofs. To buy any of the pictures would have cost a hell of a lot more than I wanted to spend. It was a sadly disappointing experience. May 07 06 03:30 pm Link Bryan Crump wrote: I do... but most of my photos are on the artistic side. It's probably stating the obvious but the closer the source is to the vision, the less editing needed. I'm improving so I've been finding myself spending lesser time in post. May 07 06 03:38 pm Link Oh yeah and talk about airbrushing/editing. They were REALLY overdone. The worst pictures EVER taken of me in my life and that's saying a lot since I've had some really bad pictures taken of me. May 07 06 03:40 pm Link Glamour shots... Not really glamourous nor, for that matter, "shots." May 07 06 03:44 pm Link |
