Forums > General Industry > THE STRUGGLE OF THE NEW MODELS. HELP!

Photographer

Fred Brown Photo

Posts: 1303

Chicago, Illinois, US

Posted by Tracey Masterson: 
Actually, the front cover of Vogue pays about 300 dollars.  Yes, 300 dollars.  The cover is not an ad.  It is not paid for by a company.  It is the cover.  The reason a model would want to be on the cover is the exposure.  The exposure gets them more gigs.  High paying gigs.  The Lancome campaign, the Gucci campaign, etc.
It doesn't matter if it is Nicole Kidman, Karen Elson or that cute little dog that is on here.  300 dollars.
I'd do it for free.

Well technically the cover of any magazine is an ad. It's an ad for the magazine and is listed on their rate or spec sheet of which they pay for.

300.00??? I won't argue this, perhaps you all have sources that I am not aware of but then again I have never booked a model for a vogue cover either - lol. I do know that photographers can make 5 figures for shooting such a cover and models like Giselle have a day rate of 7,000-15,000 and a magazine could have a 6 figure budget just for the cover so 300 seems low to me but I concur.

Jun 30 05 11:48 am Link

Model

veester

Posts: 346

Portland, Oregon, US

Posted by Tracey Masterson: 
Actually, the front cover of Vogue pays about 300 dollars.  Yes, 300 dollars.  The cover is not an ad.  It is not paid for by a company.  It is the cover.  The reason a model would want to be on the cover is the exposure.  The exposure gets them more gigs.  High paying gigs.  The Lancome campaign, the Gucci campaign, etc.
It doesn't matter if it is Nicole Kidman, Karen Elson or that cute little dog that is on here.  300 dollars.
I'd do it for free.

Heck Yeah! i'm with you! I'd totally do it for free!

Jun 30 05 12:01 pm Link

Photographer

Michael_Creagh

Posts: 114

New York, New York, US

NEW YORK IS NOT ALL ROSES for models.  I am reading this discussion and am a bit astonished on how you all think things work here. 

1.  Just because you live in or near NYC, you will not necessarily be taken by an agency.

2.  Going to enough Open Calls, does not ensure getting into an agency.  It takes a certain amount of personal development, luck, and a marketable look.  There are tens of great girls for every good fashion agency spot.  So competition is hard. 

3.  Personal Development can mean a lot of things, and some people have it all together by the time they get to the open calls.  This means strict weight/height stats.  The right hair style/attitude.

4.  Luck means luck....or finding a way around stringent guidelines and tough competition.  That can mean a great deveopled up book.

Julia understands this and is trying.  She has photographed with me and tried several other internet photgraphers, but has had a less than hoped experience.  And that is what this post is about.

One or two shoots does not make a book and that is why she went out and shot a bunch of TFPs.  I shoot paid model tests for model agencies (like Christian), but again one $200-500 shoot doesn't suffice.  You have to get out there and shoot and shoot often.  Some of the girls in NYC are going to the open calls after switching or getting dropped from an agency and have 100-300 pro shoots behind them and are 18 years old.  It is just a sad tale that the internet is becoming a hindrance to fashion models looking to get experience.

Also I don't mind that some of you criticise my work, fair game, and the stuff is raw and not retouched.  She and I will have to look into that.  But for the sake of fashion photography lay off the darkness issue, as it is not relevant.  You all are just too used to the "Bright Bikini Blitz" of internet photography.

Thanks and please feel free to e-mail me personally with industry issues at [email protected]

Best of luck,
Michael Creagh
http://michaelcreagh.com

Jun 30 05 12:58 pm Link

Model

theda

Posts: 21719

New York, New York, US

I find the deliberate darkness of Mike's shots (and a lot of other fashion shooters these days) works a lot better on paper than on the internet.  Between variation in monitor calibrations, etc., you have a lot less leeway in what works for an internet portfolio. I try to stay away from very dark or very bright for websites because i figure I'll just end up blinding someone somewhere.

We know that just going to open calls in NYC isn't any gaurantee, but Julia (who hasn't been back) didn't say anything at all in her intial post about even approaching agencies, so we gave a lot of general advice that may have included everything she's already tried.

Jun 30 05 01:14 pm Link

Photographer

piers

Posts: 117

London, Arkansas, US

Posted by Michael_Creagh:   You all are just too used to the "Bright Bikini Blitz" of internet photography. 

Nice wink

Jun 30 05 02:23 pm Link

Photographer

Glamour Studio /Gary

Posts: 1237

Posted by Julia Rocker: 
I have been Trying to make it in this business  for 2 years I have met a lot of perverts went through scary pervert experiences that will never happen again because now I use an escort and wasted a lot of money traveling, Clothing, Hair, Makeup, Tanning and all the other stuff you have to buy and do for a shoot when you are on your own. There were a lot of times when I never even saw my work and never got my pictures I almost gave up a lot of times because it becomes disappointing and it takes forever I know I have all requirements for modeling I just need a little more practice on posing and face expressions they are not easy It takes time to master specially when my under eye looks like hell from my night job sometimes.The last thing I noticed was also a waste of time is those big shoots with like 6 Photographers and a bunch of out of shape/short/with bad features wanna be so called models with their porn star poses It made me feel so out of place and like such a waste of time I use to do it for pictures but realized it was a bad idea. I really wish I can pay a really good High fashion Photographer but I am dirt poor I live on my own and money is tough this days when you are a good girl. This Internet portfolio stuff is mostly a waste of time for me because I get too many bad offers I don't want playboy wanna be pictures or the kidnapped girl in a basement look is not going to get me into Vogue or Victoria's secret I know that I need High fashion and Glamour pic's for a start but were are this kind of photographers  save me guys! Sometimes I don't even know What to do or were to go anymore. Do models go through all this junk in the beginning or do I have bad luck?

Jun 30 05 07:41 pm Link

Photographer

Doug Dimler

Posts: 42

Tampa, Florida, US

I work in a totally different genre (sp?).  My specialty is car and bike models because there seems to be a need for that in my area.  Although I do portfolio work for models in all aspects of modeling.  I don't have advice, but more of examples.  One of my friends was modeling and got out of it because of all the crazy things that happened to her.  She left modeling for a while and is now back into it with a new attitude and a new outlook.  I just talked to her the other day and she is loving it.  No, she's not big time, but is enjoying being infront of the camera again.  She now says that she has forgotten about what each shot can do for her and thinks about enjoying the moment once she's made her surroundings safe.  My other example is another friend of mine has been acting for many years and had his ups and downs with it.  All of his friends back home truly envy his drive and determination.  He's getting older, but is still determined that one day all of his dreams will come true. 

I guess I do have one bit of advice.  2% of the people really make it to the big time in their profession.  They make it there for a reason.  Find your reason and don't let anyone stop you or tell you that it might be time to find a new "HOBBY".  That's crap!!  You do what you have to do without comprising yourself and everything will be fine.  If you don't reach what you want, the maybe it was because there's another reason.  But you won't know if you don't stick it out now will you. 

Take care!

Doug
D2Images

Jun 30 05 11:22 pm Link

Photographer

Anthony Citrano

Posts: 245

Venice, California, US

Posted by Fred Brown: 
Well technically the cover of any magazine is an ad.

I think the EIC of any reputable magazine would disagree strongly with that statement.  To suggest editorial is for sale is blasphemous to most editors.

Posted by Fred Brown: 
It's an ad for the magazine and is listed on their rate or spec sheet of which they pay for.

Inside front cover, rear cover, and rear inside cover are all often available to buy, depending on a magazine's layout.  But I don't know of any magazine that'll sell front cover or at all considers FC available to the publishing side.  Front cover is always editorial.  Otherwise, it's a catalog, not a magazine.

Jun 30 05 11:41 pm Link

Photographer

Anthony Citrano

Posts: 245

Venice, California, US

Posted by Tracey Masterson: 
Actually, the front cover of Vogue pays about 300 dollars.  Yes, 300 dollars.  The cover is not an ad.  It is not paid for by a company.  It is the cover.  The reason a model would want to be on the cover is the exposure.  The exposure gets them more gigs.  High paying gigs.  The Lancome campaign, the Gucci campaign, etc.
It doesn't matter if it is Nicole Kidman, Karen Elson or that cute little dog that is on here.  300 dollars.
I'd do it for free.

To your point, I'd be stunned if anyone cares about the $300.  8-)

Jul 04 05 10:46 pm Link