Forums >
General Industry >
Bad Skin, does it really matter?
Porchia wrote: Kiehl's for me please Oct 30 06 05:17 pm Link UnoMundo Photography wrote: LMAO! Oct 30 06 05:19 pm Link I have good skin and need very little photoshopping. If a photographer remembers "hey wow I didn't have to photoshop her a great deal...I want to shoot with her again!" then that's to your benefit. but if your skin is terrible and takes hours of photoshopping then there's a chance that photographer won't want to work with you again Oct 30 06 05:19 pm Link Isys Entertainment wrote: If a model has really bad skin the agency may step in and book her out for a while until her skin clears. Means that they won't send her to castings or go-sees because the bad skin would make an impression on photographers, editors, designers, etc that they most likely wouldn't forget so quickly. Yes of cousre it can get photoshopped out but that is expensive. post production is a timely and expensive matter so the less has to be done the better. Oct 30 06 06:14 pm Link I've often pondered the same question. I get the "thank fucking god you have great skin" comment often and I know the obvious reason why but some seem more overly-excited. Which I see why now. Makes sense. Oct 30 06 06:25 pm Link Yes, but not really. Oct 30 06 06:39 pm Link Isys Entertainment wrote: I like your cheeks ! the ones on the face too Oct 30 06 07:20 pm Link Sita Mae Edwards wrote: The shortcuts typically used won't work if the image needs to look unretouched; wizards still have to do it one by one. Oct 30 06 07:36 pm Link Porchia wrote: Oh Yaaaaayyyy another Aveeno lover....lol. Oct 30 06 07:52 pm Link Two things work for poor skin, makeup and photoshop or some other editing program. It happens. Hire good makeup artists and much of your editing problem is gone. Just my opinion. Models, keeping your skin as clean as possible and moisturized is you responsibility. Oct 31 06 08:23 am Link |