Pat Thielen wrote:
There was an issue of Howard the Duck with an advocate demanding that all animals be clothed.
  -P-

Howard the Duck was a kind of an edgy [or should that be "on the edge"] character if only because he kept trying to get into Lea Thompson's pants.

ROTFLMAO

Studio36

InDecisivE wrote:
Wow.

Landra Lee Photography wrote:
People need to find better things to do with their time than complain about chew toys. What is the world coming to. Jeebus.

It helps to avoid real issues!

Just like the election campaign platform that suggests "Make war not (gay) love!"

Pat Thielen wrote:
... I think it's silly for a chicken to be wearing a bikini, especially seeing as how they have no breats to be covered in the first place...
  -P-

Pat's absolutely correct.  Chickens are not mammals and have no breasts!!!
Now I'm gonna go sue KFC because they've been selling products that actually never existed!!!

: )

Brandon Smith wrote:
Now that was a hot chicken... any photographers interested in shooting her?  I call dibs on being her manager!

There are already enough chicks in bathingsuits on this site... and some of their skins are so photoshopped, that they look like rubber too...

studio36uk wrote:
As stories of American attitudes on nudity go this one is hard to beat:

Studio36

--------

A fowl tale; Can rubber chickens be obscene?

By Adam Gaffin, Boston Globe Correspondent,  March 5, 2006

Somebody in Roslindale is deeply offended by the bikini-clad rubber-chicken doggie chew toys in the window of Pet Cabaret on Washington Street. Lisa Di Pietro, one of the pet supply store's owners, reports on her Pet Talk at Pet Cabaret about a phone call from an irate man:

''He asks how he is supposed to walk his children by our store and explain to them why there are naked chickens in the window."

The other owner, Lisa Schlossberg, ''explained to him that all chickens are naked, they usually don't wear clothes." And the chicken ''was wearing a purple polka-dot bikini, and so was not naked.

''He remained unconvinced. He threatened to call the mayor's office and report us. (I am not sure which department of Mayor Menino's office deals with rubber chickens.)"

that is the funniest thing ever!

Pat Thielen wrote:
Some people should not be allowed to breed.

For this one I like Scott Adams' expression for indicating ironic dismay...

"... and then he voted."

M

C R Photography wrote:
For some reason I think there is a rubber chicken department in the White House.

Oh yea, it's called the Oval Office

That should be the "OVOID" office. LOL

Studio36

Pat Thielen wrote:
I think it's silly for a chicken to be wearing a bikini, especially seeing as how they have no breats to be covered in the first place.

Assuming that's a typo, chickens most certainly DO have breasts! They are my favorite part - and the first pieces I grab from the bucket. :-p

If you ARE referring to breats, maybe they are located in the same area as the chicken's nuggets...???

;-)

UnoMundo Photography wrote:
One word:  Republicans!

One word for you...IGNORANT especially since Roslindale is a neighborhood in Boston, a predominantly DEMOCRAT, Liberal city, it's more likely that it was a Democrat.

studio36uk wrote:
Howard the Duck was a kind of an edgy [or should that be "on the edge"] character if only because he kept trying to get into Lea Thompson's pants.

And who WOULDN'T??? 

BasementStudios wrote:

One word for you...IGNORANT especially since Roslindale is a neighborhood in Boston, a predominantly DEMOCRAT, Liberal city, it's more likely that it was a Democrat.

yeah, but that was the lone Republican living in the neighborhood