Forums > General Industry > Speaking of Hooters
Search

Photographer

CSI-PHOTO

Posts: 268

Trenton, Michigan, US

I've been hearing rumors about Corp. Hooters restricting girls employed by Hooters from doing shoots with independant photogs unless companied by a Hooters manager...also if the girl is employed by Hooters and the girl shoots for a magazine such FHM, Maxum...etc., the girl(s) would be terminated. Has anyone else heard this?

Feb 28 06 03:56 pm Link

Photographer

Richard Tallent

Posts: 7136

Beaumont, Texas, US

If you post in uniform, yes (they own that trademarked look), and probably also if you identify yourself as a "Hooter's girl."

Off-topic, but here's the employee "grooming" manual... pretty funny stuff:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/09 … ters1.html

Feb 28 06 05:57 pm Link

Photographer

William Coleman

Posts: 2371

New York, New York, US

Richard Tallent wrote:
If you post in uniform, yes (they own that trademarked look), and probably also if you identify yourself as a "Hooter's girl."

Off-topic, but here's the employee "grooming" manual... pretty funny stuff:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/09 … ters1.html

LOL.  I got all hot and bothered, reading about how the shorts and shirt have to fit on the Hooters girls.

Feb 28 06 06:10 pm Link

Search