|
Forums >
General Industry >
Twins and some of thier more Sexual Poses
Not sure if this has been asked but who knows Anyways, am I the only one who thinks when some twin adult models pose in certain ways, that is suppose to portray sexual feelings or acts, is kind of gross??? I mean don't get me wrong 2 women posing together is nice but when they are related and posing overly sexual my mind reels to incest within the family and that to me is not attractive. Now 2 unrelated women more power to ya  thumbs up Does anyone else feel that way when you see twins do that or is it just me??? Jan 28 06 02:39 pm Link Actually I'm in total agreement with you. I mean I can see it being a turn on in a 3 way or something of that matter but with each other adds too much of an incest feel to it and it's kind of creepy to me Jan 28 06 02:43 pm Link It is disturbing. If disturbing is what you're going for then I guess that's a great (fast and cheap, really) way to get there. Jan 28 06 02:45 pm Link Nastay. Jan 28 06 02:47 pm Link whew good I wasn't alone in my thinking Jan 28 06 03:27 pm Link Well as a twin myself i must step in here. My twin and i are not only close but bestfriends. Now we have modeled toghther before yes, and done some pretty "sexy" poses BUT by no means does this mean were having sex. Some twins, actully most twins are just naturally close. I have seen tons of twins pose, and pretty in depth posing which made me wonder too...but then i just think o fmy sister and I. Were just bestfriends, no licking, fingering, or anything of that sort...what harm are we doing? Thats my 5 cents Jan 28 06 03:35 pm Link that's called exploitation .... pure and simple ... Jan 28 06 03:43 pm Link Louis Braga wrote: It's called art, the twins are not doing anything sexual, like touching each others privites or licking or humping, or whatever. So whats the problem??LOL Jan 28 06 03:44 pm Link Louis Braga wrote: If they sign a release you are not exploiting them, they know their images are going to be used , and possibly sold. Jan 28 06 03:47 pm Link Erin-Lynn wrote: Well .. just take a second to read the header that says "sexual poses" ... Jan 28 06 03:47 pm Link twins posing in friendly ways and not simulating sexual acts is fine and great......Id shoot that no problem.... but when i see them doing poses that 2 lesbians or a man and woman non related should be doing to me it just sends out the wrong signal. If they are simulating sexual acts and thats what the poses are menat to do then ofcourse its going to be taken that way. Wether it is really going on or not. Im not even a guy so Im pretty sure men who get turned on by twins who "may" engage in each other that way are seriously thinking its going on. Jan 28 06 03:48 pm Link I have been seeking twins for some mirror image style art shots, no nudity required. But because so many have this naughty"thing" for twins, it is extremely difficult to find twins who will to the shoots because they automatically assume I want twins for porn shots. Jan 28 06 03:49 pm Link Oh okay i must be stupid then, i didnt read that right. Okay well if they are posing like they are lovers, touching eachothers "things" then yes that is kinda icky. Other then that though i see no problems with being"close"in picture's.... Jan 28 06 03:49 pm Link Glamour Boulevard wrote: in that case they are promoting incest in exchange for $$$ Jan 28 06 03:50 pm Link Louis Braga wrote: Not exactly if its not porn stuff, like banging eachothers brains out...heheeh Jan 28 06 03:51 pm Link Erin-Lynn wrote: Agree totally... Jan 28 06 03:52 pm Link Louis Braga wrote: This is way off topic.Did you know that the definition of incest says nothing about same sex sexual acts?And that even if related, incest between two family members which are adults is not illegal?Icky, yes, but illegal no. And Incest laws were actually started by cattle breeders, bet ya didn`t know that. Jan 28 06 03:52 pm Link Glamour Boulevard wrote: Yes i knew that, and personally i think its cool. I say each to their own, if you of age in your state or province then do whatever you want, just dont tell me about it or share picture's with me....plain and simple Jan 28 06 03:54 pm Link Erin-Lynn wrote: If "Banging" is your only definition of porn ... good for you ... Jan 28 06 03:55 pm Link If they're adults, hey. (said the guy who shot a set of twins naked together across silk sheets) Jan 28 06 03:57 pm Link Louis Braga wrote: Well dear everything else is foreplay, we do it everyday....anyways i think porn is something you get paid for doing, weather it be foreplay or banging Jan 28 06 03:59 pm Link Monsante Bey wrote: adults rape too ... Jan 28 06 03:59 pm Link ok im just going to put up a few examples.... Appropriate Posing...hope the links work http://www.littlereddog.co.uk/twins/03.gif http://www.littlereddog.co.uk/twins/twins2.jpg http://www.glenntwins.com/twn1.jpg http://www.glenntwins.com/ed6.jpg http://www.glenntwins.com/ed2.jpg I feel those are appropriate and ok.....in my opinion Jan 28 06 04:01 pm Link dncphotos wrote: Well... so I am wondering... are identical twins an exception maybe? Jan 28 06 04:01 pm Link Louis Braga wrote: it isnt rape if they consent to it. this also brings up the definition of the word rape. the original definition had nothing to do with a sex act. just like sluts original definition has nothing to do with being sexually active with just anyone or alot of people. Jan 28 06 04:03 pm Link UdoR wrote: loll still gross to me....but thats my opinion....not everyone will have the same and Im cool with that... Jan 28 06 04:03 pm Link Erin-Lynn wrote: That's funny .. you just contradicted yourself .. Jan 28 06 04:04 pm Link I agree... In the world of sexuality its deemed okay when things involve two woman (dancing, kisses, nude together). Anything involving sexual touch with family member is nasty (unless one is a goat and you live W. VA). Stick two dudes (brothers) in the photo and make me throw up. Then everyones says that nasty. Cause it is Jan 28 06 04:07 pm Link Louis Braga wrote: I'm sorry, but wtf are you talking about? Jan 28 06 04:30 pm Link Monsante Bey wrote: I THINK he thinks incest automatically means rape. Jan 28 06 04:32 pm Link There's nothing hotter than 2 sexy twin sisters getting down on it. OMG, that's a paradise at its best. Jan 28 06 04:46 pm Link Glamour Boulevard wrote: Geez laweez..... Jan 28 06 04:52 pm Link So if it's 2 girls that aren't twins, you are o.k. with it? I just want to make sure you are offended by incest and not lesbians. Lesbians are a beautiful thing, especially if the look like each other (but not twins, of course). LOL Mark Jan 28 06 05:11 pm Link Monsante Bey wrote: Cool shot Jan 28 06 05:13 pm Link Thanks, did it at what.... 4AM??? Something like that. Last set, too. Talk about being dog tired. Jan 28 06 05:24 pm Link dncphotos wrote: I've read this a few times and I am not sure if the images you are talking about are "sexual" "sensual" or "out right pornographic" Jan 28 06 05:28 pm Link Glamour Boulevard wrote: thats not sexual, thats sleeping..like sisters do.. Jan 28 06 05:32 pm Link The idea of twins in these sexy poses really has nothing to do with the twins. The viewer isn't supposed to think of them as twins (unless that's his/her kink, I guess), its a matter of the two beautiful women being together. Depending on the pose, you might be able to see back and front at same time, or top and bottom. I think if you sit there get the five second response, its "This is hot!" If you sit and stare at it for 30 seconds, the "Okay, so its a little creepy" starts to happen. I guess what I'm badly saying here is not to overanalyze this. Posing is not the same as doing. And if it sells magazines or posters or whatever, then go for it. Jan 28 06 05:39 pm Link Vance wrote: Thanks. Jan 28 06 05:44 pm Link Vance wrote: Ditto on everything you said. Jan 28 06 05:51 pm Link |
