Tim Downin wrote:

I suppose he know's most of these people personally?  Whether or not his assertions are true would be a non-issue, but I would think that statements like this would be fairly difficult to substantiate.  Sounds to me like someone's attempting to unfairly influence trade and drive local business into his studio.

You think?

Bluemoon Photography wrote:
I love how we see 17 year olds as naive little girls, 18 year olds as "Barely Legal" porn stars.

It's even worse than that if you consider that there is a legal difference between 18years -1 day [naive little girl] and 18 years +1 day ["Barely Legal" porn star]

LOL

Studio36

Greg Randles wrote:
Draw your own conclusions

About?

Hamza wrote:
I photographed my Step Daughters friend once because she wanted to submit photos to an agency, she asked if I could do a nude one, Playboy Style for her BF!  My step daughter told her to go home and use a Polaroid if she wanted pics like that, she was holding the reflector and later appologized for her Ho friend's question. 

Teens do ask, they are a lot more sexual today than they were only 10 years ago...

Just say NO!

It was more than twenty years ago that I was chatting with a guy I had known as a GWC shooting the nude people on Blacks Beach in San Diego about his photo studio.  His business was shooting for the likes of Hustler type mags at the time.  He told me he had minors calling him up and asking to come down and do photo sessions.  He had the good business sense to tell them to come back when they were 18.  I'd say from that they do ask.