Forums > General Industry > Butts - a closer look.

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

I just did, but then I chickened out and made it just a link. Oh well.

Dec 27 05 04:31 pm Link

Model

Horsie Girl

Posts: 1453

Santa Rosa, California, US

https://modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic_id=4369b87519375


This is my butt, not a very good picture tho

Dec 27 05 04:32 pm Link

Model

theda

Posts: 21719

New York, New York, US

I have no butt.  I can't play along.

That's the real reason we won't let you post your ass.

Dec 27 05 04:33 pm Link

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

theda wrote:
I have no butt.  I can't play along.

That's the real reason we won't let you post your ass.

You had a butt once! I've seen pictures......

Dec 27 05 04:34 pm Link

Photographer

American Glamour

Posts: 38813

Detroit, Michigan, US

Horsie Girl wrote:
This is my butt, not a very good picture tho

OK, looks anonymous to me, but a good picture.

Dec 27 05 04:36 pm Link

Photographer

The Girl Factor

Posts: 153

Chattanooga, Tennessee, US

There is No booty like the "Brooke Booty"

https://pic1.modelmayhem.com/1/1/5/5/9/ … a6f369.jpg

Dec 27 05 04:37 pm Link

Photographer

ThefStopsHere

Posts: 2387

Olympia, Washington, US

Lapis wrote:

You had a butt once! I've seen pictures......

i had a butt once... but it had a crack in it.  I was hoping for a new one this christmas.

Dec 27 05 04:37 pm Link

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

We need the same rule for 'ass' threads that we do for b(o)(o)bie threads...if it ain't bare, it ain't fair. Thrown out if you aren't showing nekkid ass.

Dec 27 05 04:38 pm Link

Model

Model Sarah

Posts: 40994

Columbus, Ohio, US

Rob and Kathi wrote:
There is No booty like the "Brooke Booty"

https://pic1.modelmayhem.com/1/1/5/5/9/ … a6f369.jpg

christ.... she should have been in the 'baby got back' video.

Dec 27 05 04:40 pm Link

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

D. Brian Nelson wrote:
taken down - That one could probably get me banned.

Hey now! I missed it.

Dec 27 05 04:40 pm Link

Photographer

ThefStopsHere

Posts: 2387

Olympia, Washington, US

Lapis wrote:
We need the same rule for 'ass' threads that we do for b(o)(o)bie threads...if it ain't bare, it ain't fair. Thrown out if you aren't showing nekkid ass.

i'm a photographer, a "tog", a "photog", a "GWC", an "artist".... i don't post bare self pix in threads... it's unprofessional.  I'll send it to your email! :-)

Dec 27 05 04:41 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

D. Brian Nelson wrote:
taken down - That one could probably get me banned.

I didn't see anything wrong with it.  Sure, it was risque, but I wouldn't call it porn.  Melvin might, but not I.

Dec 27 05 04:42 pm Link

Photographer

American Glamour

Posts: 38813

Detroit, Michigan, US

Ian Weintraub wrote:

i'm a photographer, a "tog", a "photog", a "GWC", an "artist".... i don't post bare self pix in threads... it's unprofessional.  I'll send it to your email! :-)

If you are a TOG, I am not sure we want you.

Photographers or GWC's only.  We don't need no stinking togs!

Dec 27 05 04:43 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

Model Sarah wrote:
http://tinypic.com/j8o7kk.jpg

This is a truly fantastic photo.

Dec 27 05 04:45 pm Link

Photographer

ThefStopsHere

Posts: 2387

Olympia, Washington, US

Alan from Aavian Prod wrote:

If you are a TOG, I am not sure we want you.

Photographers or GWC's only.  We don't need no stinking togs!

personally, i prefer "l'artiste" which i'm called quite frequently... that or "c*ck sucker".  I get that one too.

Dec 27 05 04:45 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

D. Brian Nelson wrote:
taken down - That one could probably get me banned.

Is this one of the socio-cultural impacts to which you refer?

Dec 27 05 04:46 pm Link

Model

Horsie Girl

Posts: 1453

Santa Rosa, California, US

So, I can't post my covered "ass"?

Dec 27 05 04:48 pm Link

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

Ian Weintraub wrote:

that or "c*ck sucker".  I get that one too.

Yeah, people stopped calling me that when I starting biting em' off.

Dec 27 05 04:48 pm Link

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

Horsie Girl wrote:
So, I can't post my covered "ass"?

you can, but it is kind of a half 'assed' attempt in a contest that is showing naked asses.

Dec 27 05 04:49 pm Link

Photographer

American Glamour

Posts: 38813

Detroit, Michigan, US

Ian Weintraub wrote:

personally, i prefer "l'artiste" which i'm called quite frequently... that or "c*ck sucker".  I get that one too.

That is fine, just no togs.

Dec 27 05 04:50 pm Link

Photographer

American Glamour

Posts: 38813

Detroit, Michigan, US

Horsie Girl wrote:
So, I can't post my covered "ass"?

I thought it was a very authentic western picture and I liked it!

Dec 27 05 04:50 pm Link

Photographer

ThefStopsHere

Posts: 2387

Olympia, Washington, US

Lapis wrote:

you can, but it is kind of a half 'assed' attempt in a contest that is showing naked asses.

you "crack" me up.

Dec 27 05 04:51 pm Link

Model

Horsie Girl

Posts: 1453

Santa Rosa, California, US

Lapis wrote:

you can, but it is kind of a half 'assed' attempt in a contest that is showing naked asses.

I showed a naked ass, it just wasn't mine.  lol

Dec 27 05 04:51 pm Link

Model

Horsie Girl

Posts: 1453

Santa Rosa, California, US

Alan from Aavian Prod wrote:

I thought it was a very authentic western picture and I liked it!

Thank you!

Dec 27 05 04:52 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

Any thoughts on the psychological impact having one's reproductive system use the same external orifices as the urinary system?  Does this perpetuate the thought that nudity and sex are dirty?

Dec 27 05 04:52 pm Link

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

Ian Weintraub wrote:

you "crack" me up.

well, it seems kind of 'ass'inine to take this thread seriously or to not put your ass on the line.

Dec 27 05 04:53 pm Link

Photographer

American Glamour

Posts: 38813

Detroit, Michigan, US

Brian Diaz wrote:
Any thoughts on the psychological impact having one's reproductive system use the same external orifices as the digestive system?  Does this perpetuate the thought that nudity and sex are dirty?

And this from a moderator!

Dec 27 05 04:54 pm Link

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

Brian Diaz wrote:
Any thoughts on the psychological impact having one's reproductive system use the same external orifices as the digestive system?  Does this perpetuate the thought that nudity and sex are dirty?

Um, my reproductive system has a different hole than my digestive system and my urinary system...so you can speak for yourself on this one....

Dec 27 05 04:55 pm Link

Model

Model Sarah

Posts: 40994

Columbus, Ohio, US

Brian Diaz wrote:
This is a truly fantastic photo.

Thank you.

I have mothers coming up to me wishing death on me because of my ass.

Dec 27 05 04:58 pm Link

Model

theda

Posts: 21719

New York, New York, US

Lapis wrote:

Um, my reproductive system has a different hole than my digestive system and my urinary system...so you can speak for yourself on this one....

Mine too. I'm now a little worried about Brian...

Dec 27 05 04:58 pm Link

Photographer

ThefStopsHere

Posts: 2387

Olympia, Washington, US

theda wrote:

Mine too. I'm now a little worried about Brian...

uhm... apparently his digestive system and his oral communication system use the same hole!! LOL

Dec 27 05 05:00 pm Link

Model

theda

Posts: 21719

New York, New York, US

Ian Weintraub wrote:

uhm... apparently his digestive system and his oral communication system use the same hole!! LOL

Wait, are you saying yours doesn't? At least at first? Hmm...

It is fortunate we are not biologists.

Dec 27 05 05:03 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

Wow, I'm sorry for that slip up.  I was erroneously thinking that the urinary tract was considered a part of the digestive system.

But still.  Pee is gross.

Dec 27 05 05:04 pm Link

Model

theda

Posts: 21719

New York, New York, US

Brian Diaz wrote:
Wow, I'm sorry for that slip up.  I was erroneously thinking that the urinary tract was considered a part of the digestive system.

But still.  Pee is gross.

But it's sterile!

Dec 27 05 05:04 pm Link

Model

Horsie Girl

Posts: 1453

Santa Rosa, California, US

Brian Diaz wrote:
Wow, I'm sorry for that slip up.  I was erroneously thinking that the urinary tract was considered a part of the digestive system.

But still.  Pee is gross.

Does that mean that you think sex is dirty?

Dec 27 05 05:05 pm Link

Photographer

Hoodlum

Posts: 10254

Sacramento, California, US

theda wrote:

But it's sterile!

even after eating a bunch of asparagus?

Dec 27 05 05:06 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

And the posterior is often considered aesthetically pleasing and errogenous, and we all know what happens back there...

Dec 27 05 05:07 pm Link

Photographer

ThefStopsHere

Posts: 2387

Olympia, Washington, US

theda wrote:

Wait, are you saying yours doesn't? At least at first? Hmm...

It is fortunate we are not biologists.

oh, you're quick on your feet... i was thinking the back-end of the process, not the front-end.

Dec 27 05 05:07 pm Link

Model

theda

Posts: 21719

New York, New York, US

Brian Diaz wrote:
And the posterior is often considered aesthetically pleasing and errogenous, and we all know what happens back there...

I used to, but after the last couple of posts, I'm not so sure...

Dec 27 05 05:08 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

Horsie Girl wrote:

Does that mean that you think sex is dirty?

A lot of people think so.  I'm just postulating that this may be a cause of such prutanical ideas.

Dec 27 05 05:09 pm Link