Forums >
General Industry >
Model Status/potential/rates/egos/etc.
I just changed my profile info to reflect my feelings on some of the issues in the subject line of this thread. Please take a moment to read and see if I am wrong. I would appreciate some feedback from both models and photographers. In my opinion, ONLY a few (if that much) models will make it to super model level or near that, from being on these internet model/photographer sites. Therefore, THIS is THE marketplace ! There is no need to hype your rates up on photographers like me and others (who care to recognise themselves in this category). You will be ignored like the business that chooses to sell items too high, in their efforts to maximize profits, versus the wise business that sells items at a lesser price and move more quantities, thus making more profits. $25 X 100 = $2500 however $150 X 3 = $450 and this could very well be within a 3-4 month period. Oct 08 05 10:35 am Link I don't think projecting negativity in your profile will get you any work. Keep sending out emails and if you get responses with rates that you consider out of bounds, just ignore them and go on to the next one. Paul Oct 08 05 11:50 am Link I must comment on this.... There ARE a lot of models on there who need to be knocked off their high horses, this I agree and they are usually called on it when they make a public thing about it. But there are also photographers that are the same way! It erks me when both models and photographers display the egos that you are talking about. However...... these people by no means represent the majority and it is unfair that all these (notice I didn't say "all) photographers are attacking models as a whole.... And "YOU are internet models, NOT supermodels !" offends me.... I know I am on the internet and I get work (paid or not) off of here, but this I do not consider myself an "internet model" the way you present it is very insulting and degrading to those of us who really put a lot of time and effort into modelling. **Getting off work and getting the hell home will finish later ** Oct 08 05 05:56 pm Link IsabelAurora wrote: Right on target with this one, Isabel. It amazes me to see the major generalization placed on labels. Internet, model and photographer are three very prominent terms individually. But, thanks to some sarcastic sid the combination of internet and either two is solely used to impose a negative impression on a certain group of experienced or hopeful models or photographers. Resumé-wise... I've never gotten work through the internet. But, I'm on here. And,it would STILL qualify me as the same. Especially because you see me on the net. OP wrote: So, I relate to it being very offensive. It's like walking up to the cops and saying "One of those Black guys did it." IsabelAurora wrote: Finally! Now hurry up. I cooked you a full dinner and ran a bubble bath with your fav. scented oils. Oct 08 05 06:21 pm Link Why do you feel it's worth more money for nudes than fashion? It is arguably just as easy to pose in clothes as without - indeed, I would argue it's harder in clothes than without. So why are you willing to pay more? Sorry, you're just the kind of market-ignorant photographer you seem to be railing against. Good luck with that. Oct 08 05 06:32 pm Link Chris Ambler wrote: I cant believe this... Oct 08 05 07:39 pm Link I think this is heading toward the subject of nudity....just watch....LOL Oct 08 05 07:44 pm Link i think he mis-spelled photos Oct 08 05 08:51 pm Link Although you're entitled to your opinion, I think you'll be hardpressed to find any model on here who agrees with what you said since you essentially insulted all models who use the internet. I think the old saying "if you can't say anything nice - don't say anything at all" applies here because you'll likely have a hard time finding "internet models" interested in working with you based on your generalizations. Oct 08 05 09:05 pm Link Thanks to each and every one of you for posting your thoughts. I sincerely appreciate it all, and I will definitely use a lot (if not all) the suggestions posted. Oct 08 05 10:01 pm Link Why stereotype internet models? I have worked with agency models and independent "internet" models. They are all different in professionalism. independents tend to be younger and don't have the experience compared to some agency models. It depends on the photographers' needs. Jan 22 07 12:11 am Link In my opinion, ONLY a few (if that much) models will make it to super model level or near that, from being on these internet model/photographer sites. Therefore, THIS is THE marketplace ! There is no need to hype your rates .... My response I think you are right on the money w this ...Most Supermodels are well on their way by age 16-17 ie signed weith agencies , getting campaign and runway work . Mention MM or OMP to them and they would probably just scratch their heads .... And as you say ( to a large extent ) MM is its own market , which is not to say thats a bad thing ,,,it is what it is . I view it as an opportunity to network , meet interesting people ( models ) develop my photographic skills and have fun . Money is not a significent factor in the equation for me...I have however found a few exceptional models through these sites that I have helped get signed w agencies , adn get runway and commercial print experience .... Yeah there are models that maybe think they are worth more than the market will bear , but there are also photographers with the same mentality ....BUt it is a free market system and there is no harm in asking if you think worth it ...... Jan 22 07 12:32 am Link Crazy-Evil Angelus wrote: IsabelAurora wrote: Right on target with this one, Isabel. It amazes me to see the major generalization placed on labels. Internet, model and photographer are three very prominent terms individually. But, thanks to some sarcastic sid the combination of internet and either two is solely used to impose a negative impression on a certain group of experienced or hopeful models or photographers. Resum�-wise... I've never gotten work through the internet. But, I'm on here. And,it would STILL qualify me as the same. Especially because you see me on the net. OP wrote: So, I relate to it being very offensive. It's like walking up to the cops and saying "One of those Black guys did it." Angelus! Where have you been? I've missed you! And I whole-heartedly agree with your post. xx Jan 22 07 12:45 am Link Tony Culture Photoz wrote: No offense, Tony, but I hated your portfolio's front page. You've embedded tons of images, including cutesy animated GIFs that contribute little good to the overall impression. Also, I found myself scrolling through the images & going right past the verbage. In fact, I didn't bother reading it all. Jan 22 07 09:58 am Link Tony Culture Photoz wrote: Negative profile = no one wants to work with you. Jan 22 07 10:11 am Link I'm sorry, what's the purpose of this post? Jan 22 07 10:13 am Link LP And Daniela hit the spot. I don't know what you are trying to get from expressing yourself like that. Jan 22 07 10:29 am Link Tony Culture Photoz wrote: LMAO, the pot calls the kettle Jan 22 07 10:39 am Link |