Forums > General Industry > New Nudity Terms

Photographer

Kelvin Hammond

Posts: 17397

Billings, Montana, US

Implied Nude makes no sense to me at all. What I see here is:

Implied Nipples
Implied Ass
Implied Pubies
Implied Sexuality
Implied Pre-pubescence (yikes)

OR

Just bare-ass naked in all the above variations.  wink

Naked is Naked. Everything else is clothed, no?  Implied.... bah!

Let's just celebrate our nakedness!

Jan 16 07 08:19 pm Link

Photographer

Joi Carey

Posts: 551

Phoenix, Arizona, US

Yeahh for  Boobies!

Jan 16 07 08:20 pm Link

Photographer

Meech Creative LLC

Posts: 97

Frederick, Maryland, US

kelvin pinney wrote:
Implied Nude makes no sense to me at all. What I see here is:

Implied Nipples
Implied Ass
Implied Pubies
Implied Sexuality
Implied Pre-pubescence (yikes)

OR

Just bare-ass naked in all the above variations.  wink

Naked is Naked. Everything else is clothed, no?  Implied.... bah!

Let's just celebrate our nakedness!

Amen. It is how God intended it. wink

Jan 16 07 08:23 pm Link

Photographer

Sophistocles

Posts: 21320

Seattle, Washington, US

I actually don't like the term "implied" because it carries, pardon the pun, an implication that may not be correct.

I prefer "occluded" nude.

But then I'm a literary snob.

Jan 16 07 08:27 pm Link

Model

ak68

Posts: 87

Bossier City, Louisiana, US

I'm all with the celebrate being naked crowd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ak

Jan 16 07 08:28 pm Link

Photographer

Incident Image

Posts: 342

Los Angeles, California, US

I prefer the term "implied clothes"

Jan 16 07 08:29 pm Link

Photographer

Kelvin Hammond

Posts: 17397

Billings, Montana, US

Incident Image wrote:
I prefer the term "implied clothes"

Hilarious!

Jan 16 07 08:41 pm Link

Photographer

Sophistocles

Posts: 21320

Seattle, Washington, US

J Douglas wrote:
Amen. It is how God intended it. wink

Who?

Jan 16 07 08:42 pm Link

Photographer

Kelvin Hammond

Posts: 17397

Billings, Montana, US

Implied Boy Shorts!

Jan 16 07 08:45 pm Link

Photographer

Meech Creative LLC

Posts: 97

Frederick, Maryland, US

Christopher Ambler wrote:

Who?

...or how some of you crawled out of the sea?

Jan 16 07 08:59 pm Link

Photographer

dgold

Posts: 10302

Pawtucket, Rhode Island, US

...implied may not even exist -
be the real deal.

Jan 16 07 09:01 pm Link

Photographer

215 Studios

Posts: 3453

Center Point, Texas, US

Implied Nude does exist:  Clear, close fitting PVC suit.  It's only "implied" because there is actually something covering all the special places...

*blink*

-Major

Jan 16 07 09:07 pm Link

Model

Carmen the MILF

Posts: 964

Sanford, North Carolina, US

Naked is good!

Jan 17 07 07:26 am Link

Model

Feral Intellect

Posts: 58

Asheville, North Carolina, US

I don't even know what to say to this, though I did post a thread asking if "implied nudity" is required to be 18+.

Jan 17 07 11:21 am Link

Model

Miss Muse

Posts: 16

Mahopac, New York, US

I love implied fashion and implied glamour.

The forum is full of implied intellect.

So... nothing wrong with implied clothing or implied nudity.

I mean, isn't a GWC an implied photog?

Just thinking out loud here...

Jan 17 07 11:26 am Link

Photographer

studio36uk

Posts: 22898

Tavai, Sigave, Wallis and Futuna

As for terms? The best of the best that I have actually heard used:

"The/A Clothed Nude"

Studio36

Jan 17 07 12:05 pm Link

Photographer

M Pandolfo Photography

Posts: 12117

Tampa, Florida, US

Agony Bliss wrote:
Yeahh for  Boobies!

I believe the correct terminology, according to The Bloodhound Gang, is "Hooray For Boobies." smile

Jan 17 07 12:10 pm Link

Photographer

SLE Photography

Posts: 68937

Orlando, Florida, US

kelvin pinney wrote:
Implied Boy Shorts!

https://www.slephoto.com/boyshorts.jpg

Jan 17 07 12:52 pm Link