Photographer
DigitalOnePhotographics
Posts: 26
Kansas City, Missouri, US
I really enjoy the opportunity MM gives people to make comments about the work of others, modeling talents, quality of photography, etc. However, I have been confused a number of times when, especially on a model profile, someone will complement the model on the way the image was photographed. Usually the comment to a model is something like... "I like the way the shot is composed or I really like the angle or the shot is really creative, and the color is so good...." Or commenting about the nice contrast in the image.... or making a comment about the lighting.. Many models, most of them, are not involved with creating composition, or angle, or final image color, or contrast, etc. So, I was just wondering if anyone else had noticed this. And shouldn't those comments be rightly given to the photographer...provided their link is available ? In all there is a good exchange of information in the commentaries and that is a good thing.
Photographer
Tog
Posts: 55204
Birmingham, Alabama, US
Digital One Imaging wrote:
I really enjoy the opportunity MM gives people to make comments about the work of others, modeling talents, quality of photography, etc. However, I have been confused a number of times when, especially on a model profile, someone will complement the model on the way the image was photographed. Usually the comment to a model is something like... "I like the way the shot is composed or I really like the angle or the shot is really creative, and the color is so good...." Or commenting about the nice contrast in the image.... or making a comment about the lighting.. Many models, most of them, are not involved with creating composition, or angle, or final image color, or contrast, etc. So, I was just wondering if anyone else had noticed this. And shouldn't those comments be rightly given to the photographer...provided their link is available ? In all there is a good exchange of information in the commentaries and that is a good thing. Pfft. You should see how many of us photographers get told we have nice tits.
Photographer
Klassic Photo
Posts: 1308
Bullhead City, Arizona, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
Pfft. You should see how many of us photographers get told we have nice tits. LMAO
Photographer
paulcobophotography
Posts: 178
Miami Beach, Florida, US
Bullhead Photography wrote:
LMAO That's too Funny!
Photographer
ShadowCrafter
Posts: 1523
Pike Road, Alabama, US
Digital One Imaging wrote:
I really enjoy the opportunity MM gives people to make comments about the work of others, modeling talents, quality of photography, etc. However, I have been confused a number of times when, especially on a model profile, someone will complement the model on the way the image was photographed. Usually the comment to a model is something like... "I like the way the shot is composed or I really like the angle or the shot is really creative, and the color is so good...." Or commenting about the nice contrast in the image.... or making a comment about the lighting.. Many models, most of them, are not involved with creating composition, or angle, or final image color, or contrast, etc. So, I was just wondering if anyone else had noticed this. And shouldn't those comments be rightly given to the photographer...provided their link is available ? In all there is a good exchange of information in the commentaries and that is a good thing. W.G. Rowland wrote:
Pfft. You should see how many of us photographers get told we have nice tits. I agree with WGR, the consistency of folks paying close attention is pretty much related to the pattern of that individual in all their posts and comments on MM.
WGR does have nice tits, but I've been disappointed that the comments have been only 50 50 on mine, and I thought I had a nice rack.
Photographer
Jeff Chan Photography
Posts: 95
New York, New York, US
i dont know about you, but i really appreciate getting compliments on my tits. I mean, come on, they're so firm I don't even need a bra!
jqc
Photographer
Girl In The Magazine
Posts: 458
Chicago, Illinois, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
Pfft. You should see how many of us photographers get told we have nice tits. Man, I thought it was just ME getting comments telling me that I'm hot! I can understand it at My Space, because it's open to every idiot on the planet, but here??? Geez...
And how do you respond to those??? "Uh, thanks...I guess?"
B.Parks
www.girlinthemagazine.com
Photographer
DigitalOnePhotographics
Posts: 26
Kansas City, Missouri, US
Thanks for the response so far. This is target on.
Photographer
Mark Reese Photography
Posts: 21622
Brandon, Florida, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
Pfft. You should see how many of us photographers get told we have nice tits. If that's what you're being told you might want to consider a gym membership, LOL.
Photographer
Bryan Benoit
Posts: 2106
Miami, Florida, US
Digital One Imaging wrote:
I really enjoy the opportunity MM gives people to make comments about the work of others, modeling talents, quality of photography, etc. However, I have been confused a number of times when, especially on a model profile, someone will complement the model on the way the image was photographed. Usually the comment to a model is something like... "I like the way the shot is composed or I really like the angle or the shot is really creative, and the color is so good...." Or commenting about the nice contrast in the image.... or making a comment about the lighting.. Many models, most of them, are not involved with creating composition, or angle, or final image color, or contrast, etc. So, I was just wondering if anyone else had noticed this. And shouldn't those comments be rightly given to the photographer...provided their link is available ? In all there is a good exchange of information in the commentaries and that is a good thing. I think that those people are commenting on the aspect of the photo that they like the best regardless of on what portfolio (model or photographer) they found it at. I have to say that I am guilty of that.
Photographer
Bryan Benoit
Posts: 2106
Miami, Florida, US
Mark Reese Photography wrote:
If that's what you're being told you might want to consider a gym membership, LOL. When I showed up with my sports bra and the gut hanging out they told me never to come back.. something about scaring the children and making the other members think that there was no hope for them either. ;o)
Model
Wenzel
Posts: 617
Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
I always send the photog photo related comments - Wenzel
Photographer
Tony Culture Photoz
Posts: 1555
Bloomfield, New Jersey, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
Pfft. You should see how many of us photographers get told we have nice tits. LMAO ! Mad funny !
Makeup Artist
NdeyeFace
Posts: 317
Los Angeles, California, US
Digital One Imaging wrote:
I really enjoy the opportunity MM gives people to make comments about the work of others, modeling talents, quality of photography, etc. However, I have been confused a number of times when, especially on a model profile, someone will complement the model on the way the image was photographed. Usually the comment to a model is something like... "I like the way the shot is composed or I really like the angle or the shot is really creative, and the color is so good...." Or commenting about the nice contrast in the image.... or making a comment about the lighting.. Many models, most of them, are not involved with creating composition, or angle, or final image color, or contrast, etc. So, I was just wondering if anyone else had noticed this. And shouldn't those comments be rightly given to the photographer...provided their link is available ? In all there is a good exchange of information in the commentaries and that is a good thing. You look so hot and sexy in your avi... oh wait... that's NOT you ::chuckles::
Yep yep that happens. Yes comments should be directed towards the right thing. Some people just don't know what to say or can't really see the method behind the madness!
Photographer
A Traveler
Posts: 5506
San Francisco, California, US
i often find that the images i post get more comments than the same image on the llamas page. unless the image is more risque and then the llama gets more.
Model
!Tiger!
Posts: 4978
New York, New York, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
Pfft. You should see how many of us photographers get told we have nice tits. LMFAO AND U DO- so I'm told
(now where is my profile ??????????)
Model
!Tiger!
Posts: 4978
New York, New York, US
Bryant Parks wrote:
Man, I thought it was just ME getting comments telling me that I'm hot! I can understand it at My Space, because it's open to every idiot on the planet, but here??? Geez...
And how do you respond to those??? "Uh, thanks...I guess?"
B.Parks
www.girlinthemagazine.com say thanks and list ure rates- for implied, 1 boob showing, 2 boobs showing
areoles and or nipples
works for me
Model
!Tiger!
Posts: 4978
New York, New York, US
Bryan Benoit wrote:
I think that those people are commenting on the aspect of the photo that they like the best regardless of on what portfolio (model or photographer) they found it at. I have to say that I am guilty of that. I agree I do and say the same thing to the photg and model on the image
because, believe it or not, there are SOME models who actualy know what ure talkin about and want a comment which is more than "nice boobies" "or u make me drool and quiver"
grrrrrrrrrrr
|
