Davis Images wrote:
http://www.post-gazette.com/localnews/20020707nude8.asp

This is a five year old case.  Is there a reason we are looking up old cases and discussing them as news now?

It is, however, interesting, but it is a decision that I have known about for a while and has been discussed on the net several times before.

Mikel Featherston wrote:
A candle in the darkness.

All hail Judge Noonan and the great American city of Philadelphia!!
...ring the Liberty Bell!
...light the lights !
We've got nothing to reach but the heights...

Searcher wrote:
Wow, I now feel so much better about the hidden showercams I installed in the other apartments in my building!

...quite a different story, pervert.
In many states, however, the crime of the above described invasion of privacy
is a mere misdemeaner....that law needs changing, upgrading.

Alan from Aavian Prod wrote:
This is a five year old case.  Is there a reason we are looking up old cases and discussing them as news now?

It is, however, interesting, but it is a decision that I have known about for a while and has been discussed on the net several times before.

I see my attentiveness needs some work.

Good call.

Searcher wrote:
Wow, I now feel so much better about the hidden showercams I installed in the other apartments in my building!

dgold wrote:
...quite a different story, pervert.

I prefer to think of myself more as an entrepreneur.

dgold wrote:
In many states, however, the crime of the above described invasion of privacy
is a mere misdemeaner....that law needs changing, upgrading.

That depends on your perspective.