Photographer
Scott Evans Photography
Posts: 578
Houston, Alaska, US
Here, is this better!
Internet models ROCK! There are none better! i work with them, love them and they always ROCK in front of the camera!
Photographer
Tog
Posts: 55204
Birmingham, Alabama, US
Nope, still got it wrong..
Here's the secret..
It doesn't matter what your opinion is.. Don't start a thread if you don't expect responses.. Even ones that don't agree with you.
Photographer
Scott Evans Photography
Posts: 578
Houston, Alaska, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
Nope, still got it wrong..
Here's the secret..
It doesn't matter what your opinion is.. Don't start a thread if you don't expect responses.. Even ones that don't agree with you. Oh I know that,,,,no worries mate! I take nothing on this site seriously. Have a great holiday!
Model
LaViolette
Posts: 9865
Hollywood, Florida, US
Don't use your experiences w/ a few to judge the group as a whole
Photographer
BlackWatch
Posts: 3825
Cleveland, Ohio, US
Now your saying that internet models rock instead of standing still like the professional ones? Do you have to use a faster shutter speed for internet models?
Photographer
Scott Evans Photography
Posts: 578
Houston, Alaska, US
BlackWatch wrote:
Now your saying that internet models rock instead of standing still like the professional ones? Do you have to use a faster shutter speed for internet models? No,,what I am showing is that no matter what my opinion is someone will always find a way to tell me I am wrong
Model
Tiara Lestari
Posts: 11436
Jhanaydāh, Jhanaydāh, Bangladesh
Emotive Photography wrote:
No,,what I am showing is that no matter what my opinion is someone will always find a way to tell me I am wrong C'mon. you're always right!
Photographer
none of the above
Posts: 3528
Marina del Rey, California, US
Emotive Photography wrote:
I take nothing on this site seriously. obviously. how can one be taken seriously when the motive is seeking models to pay for a portfolio picture rather than hiring them for assignments presented by clients?
assignments are certainly far greater value for the model, but then again, it comes down to the question of true value and seriousness for internet vs....for models and photographers alike.
--face reality
Photographer
Scott Evans Photography
Posts: 578
Houston, Alaska, US
Katy Goldapple wrote:
Don't use your experiences w/ a few to judge the group as a whole Kathy,
I need to make this as clear as possible. I said that internet models ROCK! If I used one of MANY bad experiences with no-shows and flake internet models as a way of holding the whole accountable then I would never shoot again. I shoot 3 to 5 times a week and 95% are off the internet. Not all off of sites like this but off the internet none the less.
I was making a point, all be it a poor one, that a model should not be defined by weather they are signed or not, it is all about professionalism
Model
Kizzy
Posts: 12249
Tulsa, Oklahoma, US
Emotive Photography wrote:
No,,what I am showing is that no matter what my opinion is someone will always find a way to tell me I am wrong My grandpa always said that opinions are like @$$holes, everybody's got one. :-)
You have a right to yours...and I really liked your work, so you must be doing something right! LOL
Photographer
Scott Evans Photography
Posts: 578
Houston, Alaska, US
Lestari wrote:
C'mon. you're always right! LOL,,I am NEVER right,,,I just like shooting and I do not care who it is,,,all I care about is that they show up! LOL
Photographer
Scott Evans Photography
Posts: 578
Houston, Alaska, US
Kizzy wrote:
My grandpa always said that opinions are like @$$holes, everybody's got one. :-)
You have a right to yours...and I really liked your work, so you must be doing something right! LOL I rarely do anything right, just read my posts LMAO!
Photographer
BlackWatch
Posts: 3825
Cleveland, Ohio, US
Emotive Photography wrote:
No,,what I am showing is that no matter what my opinion is someone will always find a way to tell me I am wrong It was a joke man....high strung now?
Model
LaViolette
Posts: 9865
Hollywood, Florida, US
Emotive Photography wrote:
Kathy,
I need to make this as clear as possible. I said that internet models ROCK! If I used one of MANY bad experiences with no-shows and flake internet models as a way of holding the whole accountable then I would never shoot again. I shoot 3 to 5 times a week and 95% are off the internet. Not all off of sites like this but off the internet none the less.
I was making a point, all be it a poor one, that a model should not be defined by weather they are signed or not, it is all about professionalism I gotcha. When I was talking about judging based on experiences, I was refferring to that OTHER thread
Photographer
stan wigmore photograph
Posts: 2397
Long Beach, California, US
I agree,there are some very good dependable models on the net
Photographer
LeDeux Art
Posts: 50123
San Ramon, California, US
Photographer
RBDesign
Posts: 2728
North East, Maryland, US
WTF is a "Modle" ? Is this something completely new that I am out of the loop on? Where can I find one?
RB
Photographer
UnoMundo
Posts: 47532
Olympia, Washington, US
Photographer
RBDesign
Posts: 2728
North East, Maryland, US
UnoMundo Photography wrote:
holiday modle job available
http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/adg/252866222.html LMAO, so that is what a modle is. I was expecting an ad specifically for a modle but that will do. If it had the word modle in it I would have to accuse you of posting it just for a laugh.
RB
|