Kelli Kickham wrote:

Hi cutie! In forums I like you.

You have a sideways picture in your modeling portfolio. Completely unacceptable.

You have outgrown the zombie shot.

You are doing good! Keep working at it, I would definitely shoot with you (me photographing).

Thanks girl! I was thinking about deleting the sideways one. I don't like it when it's horizontal. Haha. Plus it's years old.

And yes, the zombie one is old as well.

Do you think I should get rid of anything else in my port? And suggestions to what I should try to add?

Amanda X3 wrote:
You should do me ^_^
I'll even give you a dancing kirby

There now you have to pick me
~AmandaX3

Yay!
I never have seen you before, but we just made friends.

Profile- "only a 0 not to bad." Too. Also, trying splitting it up with spaces so it isn't just one block of text. Good, though. New, but personable.

You need better pictures. You are cute and I would shoot with you, but not based on your work as of yet.

Also, in every picture your face is at a tilt the same direction. I know you may think you have a good side and a bad side, but I assure you they aren't that different.

amycore wrote:

Thanks girl! I was thinking about deleting the sideways one. I don't like it when it's horizontal. Haha. Plus it's years old.

And yes, the zombie one is old as well.

Do you think I should get rid of anything else in my port? And suggestions to what I should try to add?

You have a great round face and nice lips. Do some pin-up (or just vintage, like 40's)

Thomas DelPorte wrote:

I know I have commented on your work... so go for it!

I like you.

That being said, I don't understand your art. It's real yet abstract. I can't decide if I like it or not.

If you did clothed models, I would work with you for the experience and to see what you come up with.

Jason Todd Ipson wrote:
Where will I shake out?

Know you and like you. I think we've argued a few times, but you're cool.

I don't like this.


Duh I would shoot with you. I would be nuts not to.

Laura Dark Photography wrote:
Oh noes!  I'm curious! 

I don't care how many places you post from. It will be a yes.

Plus, you're effing sexy.

Kelli Kickham wrote:

Yay!
I never have seen you before, but we just made friends.

Profile- "only a 0 not to bad." Too. Also, trying splitting it up with spaces so it isn't just one block of text. Good, though. New, but personable.

You need better pictures. You are cute and I would shoot with you, but not based on your work as of yet.

Also, in every picture your face is at a tilt the same direction. I know you may think you have a good side and a bad side, but I assure you they aren't that different.

Yay I like new friends ^_^
I do tend to dislike the other side of my face
probably a bad habbit.
But thank you for the advice
and I'm definetly working on getting new pictures
I've only had 2 photoshoots
so I know theres tons of room for improvement
~AmandaX3

Kelly Watkins wrote:


And if the smiley isn't enough for you... we have the same name. Except only one of us is spelling it right.

Hee Hee.

I see your name and I automatically think "That one picture of stella...."

That's good branding.

I love your work and how you play with shapes.

So, yeah, for sure.


And don't blame me, blame your parents for spelling your name wrong.

Kaylin Omo wrote:
love your look-think we'd compliment each other?

You can't afford to do trade.

You have weak pictures in your portfolio. Why not build it to be better?

You also have 4 photos from the same set.

I think completely stopping TF is stupid, personally, if you like modeling at all. Selective is good. Plus it jsut makes you sound stuck up. And for photographers it is different. Getting older doesn't matter for them. Things changing doesn't matter for them. We, on the other hand, have to keep ourbooks updated with nothig but the best images.

Anyway, portfolio wise you are great. If I didn't read your profile I would love to trade. Gorgeous.

Not a fan of this. You look bored, and not in a good way.



Love love love this.

DigitAl Photographix wrote:
OK. Count me in! You opinion . . . pos or neg . . . valued and appreciated!

Alright, most of your wor is really guy with camera.

I believe I've had a few nice correspondences with you, so I feel bad saying this.

Most of your models look like "Oh, I am so hott," except I don't even find the pictures all that appealing so it makes the attitude annoying.

"Anna Partidge with her pear tree"? Corny. And icky. All at the same time.

Your pin up models aren't expressive enough.

So, what do I like? I really like these.



Your avi



18+
https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic … 2009-07-07 01:20:22&id=480133&pid=13151591&the_count=5&group_id=35718&ua=

Please keep in mind, it is no secret I don't like glamour.

If your work isn't close to the standards of Keeling or California Dreamer, it's pretty likely I won't be a fan.

Either way, best of luck to you. And sorry.

v e l o c i t y wrote:
hrm, i'm curious... i don't have much presence anymore.

i think we could make some interesting images together though.
and i'd love to do shoot some weird polaroid stuff with you.

///Leah

You've shot with Tony! I've heard good things about you.

I would love that.


Yes, you rock. I love everything. You are so individually you, and it's stunning.

Chip Morton wrote:
Blow me like ya know me, homie!

I know you a bit.

Every piece in your portfolio is flawed. Either blurry, odd contrast, or something.

But it works. All of it.

Kudos to you and yeah, I would trade.

inthedeck wrote:
I need a good crtique...so, I'm open to the good, the bad, and the ugly, too. 

If we're still playin', of course. 

Your profile is OK. I think it might hinder you from working with some really good models because, truth be told, to be among the best you have alot of improving to do

You have some really strong work and some less strong work. Work with making sure your lighting matches the mood of the image. Also, the contrast seems a bit weak on some of the images, but not weak enough to looklike a stylistic choice.

Your work with Tatiana is amazing, and I would trade.

hedSHOTS wrote:
Let's do it.

Never seen you so we start on neutral ground.

Many of your headshots make the eyes too bright and the skin too out of focus or blurred. It doesn't serve the purpose of what they are supposed to be.
Second row, pictures 3 and 4 are the excpetions, they are flawless.

I would trade.

Toya Alley wrote:
Hi Kelli!!

You seem kind. I like it.

You are gorgeous.

It's really too bad your pictures suck.

Actually, your first row is great besides his ugly logo. I really like the laundromat. It makes no sense, but I am a fan.

Get better shots.

I would shoot with you trade now though. I like your look.

Sammm Williams wrote:
hey girl hey!

You seem sweet.

Gorgeous commercial look.

I would shoot with you, but you really need to go talk to some agencies. Now.

Plus Model Sumer wrote:
Okie Dokie

"without being a size 0."

Do you know how much bad mojo is associated with size zero? Ever been made fun of for your weight? Me too. It's bad no matter what direction it is pointing, and it's hateful. Especially those of us who wouldn't say something about others.

See how bad that can be taken? I didn't take it that bad, but honestly, why risk making people mad or upset? There's no reason to bring any other size into it.


I think if we had the perfect concept, we could model together. It kind of goes off of "every woman is beautiful" except it actually includes us tall skinny minnies.

You are beautiful and look like you are having fun. Best of luck to you.

I don't like the dark black make up on you though. The natural stuff is just so stunning.

Ron McKinney wrote:
I'm in!  Here's to hoping you remember me!   

I like you.

I hate picture 3 and that pink bg is horrid.

I think you can do much better, more crisp work than a lot of your portfolio shows.

I would trade because I like you and the dance shot rocks.

Kelli Kickham wrote:
Your work with Tatiana is amazing, and I would trade.

Glad to know that I made the 'cut.' 

It's only been a year and a half since I started...so, here's hoping for a better and more prosperous year.  For us both.  Cheers.   

Appreciate the time...and honesty.

M.

Niall Photo wrote:
Good heavens, I have to maintain a professional demeanor, a code of personal behaviour AND
an online persona, ruh-roh.

Really you just need a lack of a crappy online persona.

I like you.

Your work is solid, yet creative to the point of toying with people's heads. I'm a huge fan of that.

Doug Swinskey wrote:
how 'bout you bite me.....

No, I am a feared of Reby. If I bit you I doubt it would end well at all.

Really, though, I see you being a jerk all the time.
And it's usually oh-so-appropriate so I'm okay with that.


But really, even if I hated (which I don't), your work would make me care infinitey less because it is so effing amazing.

I would love to trade with you, but it seems odd that you would be interested when you have your own personal Reby. Boo.

Kelli Kickham wrote:

You have a great round face and nice lips. Do some pin-up (or just vintage, like 40's)

Awesome. :] I'm actually in the process of scheduling one. Thank you, Kelli.

Garry k wrote:
Well in the real world I once asked my model /photographer friend Lebrone if I was the biggest shit disturber on MM , and he responded "well you are in the top 3 " ( but I have toned it down in recent times )

so I am guessing probably  not


the MM forums have as much to do with the real world as Jerry Springer has to do with the real world

True. But if you're a prick here then I usually doubt my experience in the real world wil be  pleasurable either. And it's my choice whether to take the risk or not.

You. When I first came here, you were very nice, and nicely said I had no chance in heck at fashion. I am glad I have changed your mind since.

I like you though, overall. I do think you say Coco's name too much. It's annoying. Save it for when someone is getting intrigued so it will push them over the line to pay you.

I still think you could work on editing, but you know that. Your work isn't perfect, but it has personality and I am a fan.

I would trade. I would want to have a solid concept, though.

Photons 2 Pixels Images wrote:

I like you. You know this!

You need to work with better models like Nolette.

I hate this.



I would trade, but I still think your work could be much stronger. Keep playing with color. It's so you.

Tyrone Lavigne wrote:
?

lol

Get out of here.

Hahaha!

You're like my favorite. Duh.

Lauren A Farrington wrote:
I don't really post in the forums very often...but I'd still love to hear what you have to say.

Wow. You are not 18.

Marry me.

No?

Okay, fine, we'll just shoot then.

Kelli Kickham wrote:

Get out of here.

Hahaha!

You're like my favorite. Duh.

Awwww, the world needs more models like you Ms. Kickham

  (stoopid bunnies are contagious lol)

Kelli Kickham wrote:
True. But if you're a prick here then I usually doubt my experience in the real world wil be  pleasurable either. And it's my choice whether to take the risk or not.

You. When I first came here, you were very nice, and nicely said I had no chance in heck at fashion. I am glad I have changed your mind since.

I like you though, overall. I do think you say Coco's name too much. It's annoying. Save it for when someone is getting intrigued so it will push them over the line to pay you.

I still think you could work on editing, but you know that. Your work isn't perfect, but it has personality and I am a fan.


I would trade. I would want to have a solid concept, though.

fair enough , I didnt think too much of that model you mention when I first met her either ( course she was a skinny pale 16yr old ) but you both have grown on me

oh , and I never look to be paid by models ,only clients

MacLeod Designs wrote:
interesting... me?

You've always been very nice.

You don't need 77 pictures. Trim out the crap.

I would trade.

But not with the icky multi-colored eyes.

I pick MUA.