Forums >
General Industry >
Passing for 16 - a lesson!
hello So all you people who claim to be able to do any age any time... please take a look at my port mwahahahaha I do pregnancy tests, wrist slitting, pill taking and all that junk as a 'teen model' I do art nude as a 'youthful model' I shoot as an adult Just so you know - taking a brave step on the NONE WHATSOEVER make up front really helps even posting straight from the camera without colour correction and editing can be a way to be all this is me like it or lump it Comments? Jun 29 06 05:50 am Link (reaches for diagnostic manual) uh, okay, how long has this been going on? Jun 29 06 05:55 am Link hahahaha - its legal issues silly you can't use a real kid for that junk. even if it is 'implied' Jun 29 06 05:59 am Link (slides away from desk with a shrug) oh ... FML Jun 29 06 06:01 am Link lol i'm sorry i probably scared you all i just get annoyed at girls who *claim* to be something theyre not. And more so when girls refuse to do certain things because of the *morality police*... you know my kids have got to see this and all that jazz. You know kids seeing the picture rather then the reality is often the point of social issues photography Jun 29 06 06:06 am Link Ahhhhh, my kind of model. A "can do" approach rather than a "can't [or won't] do" at-ti-tude. Studio36 Jun 29 06 06:29 am Link studio36uk wrote: BOOK ME BOOK ME! lol Jun 29 06 06:36 am Link oh wait you better see my coffee demands first Jun 29 06 06:36 am Link Sian Louise wrote: I don't know about the law in the UK, but over here in the good ole uptight, Puritanical USA it is even against the law to create an image portraying a child in a sexually provocative or explicit position by using an adult model posing as a child if the intent is to make the viewer think it is a child. Even such things as photoshopping a child's head on an adult's body in an explicit image or explicit or suggestive artwork of a child is against the law. Jun 29 06 06:41 am Link Social issues photography is not porn. If you had read my portfolio you would see that i don't do porn or any level higher then closed leg art nude. I am 19 in a few weeks time. I have been shooting for a long time. Long enough to know about model releases and copyright and underage models! I think you'll find if the Bible belt got back on track that most fashion models are between 14 and 18. Fashion is often implied nude. What i shoot is a blurred face and a needle or else an arm with a razor in hand. Images likely to appear on an NHS poster or a problem page in a teen magazine. Thank you kindly and one last thing: NO PORN PLEASE WE'RE BRITISH! Jun 29 06 06:45 am Link Sian Louise wrote: Coffee I can do, no problem. Maybe even the odd biscuit as well. Jun 29 06 07:01 am Link yes but [diva i don't do diet! non of that skinny latte rubbish for me /diva] Jun 29 06 07:07 am Link Sian Louise wrote: Nope - only a full bodied and well rounded cuppa with real full fat cream... none of that frothy trash 1% milk crap. LOL Jun 29 06 07:36 am Link its seems we are along in our love of full fat extra good stuff and i thought americans were supposed to appriciate coffee... i think i'll cross out that assumption and replace it with italians Jun 29 06 07:48 am Link I don't think you really look that young.I'd say you look 18 to me. Jun 29 06 08:02 am Link Nice It's good to be versatile. People always check my ID too because they think I'm under age. It's so bizarre. I pass anwhere from 13 to 23 in real life. I don't really know how old I look in pictures though.. Jun 29 06 12:41 pm Link I don't see why anyone would want to pose nude to look like a child.I'd feel weird doing that knowing pedophiles were probably getting off to it. Jun 29 06 12:44 pm Link i think you'll find my dear that you missed the point here. Jun 29 06 12:45 pm Link Sian Louise wrote: I did? Jun 29 06 12:53 pm Link yes i dont do porn. full stop - i'm talking about lifestyle/commercial/editorial/social issues photography. i have to look like a general teenager but not like an inappropriate teenager - hence the out of focus type face shots. nude is something specific - i think the shots in here show me as the age i am Jun 29 06 01:05 pm Link Nora_Neko wrote: Pedophiles will get off sitting on a park bench, will you no longer take your kids to the park? Jun 29 06 01:10 pm Link In any case, you ARE old enough to know that your nudes should be flagged 18+. I went in and manually did so for your current avatar. At least your other ones were already done. Jun 29 06 01:12 pm Link yeah that was probs a mistake. i even flag implied nudes normally Jun 29 06 01:15 pm Link back to the point... tips on looking old/young in photos? besides no make up and pig tails. Jun 29 06 01:17 pm Link Sian Louise wrote: I'd shoot you while I'm in the UK but your sherrif and I have had ... issues. Jun 29 06 01:26 pm Link Nora_Neko wrote: Sexuality doesn't begin at an age prescribed by the state. Child sexual activities exist and have been the topic of many mainstream books and movies. Child pornography laws were originally predicated on the idea that children were being exploited when they are produced. Simulation of underage sexual activities have repeatedly been declared Constitutional by the Supremes because children are not being used to produce them. The latest changes to the federal child porn statutes that once again attempt to ban simulated activity have not been tested. Nora_Neko wrote: It will be a cold day in hell before I start restricting what I do based on the suggestion that someone somewhere might get a thrill out of it. In fact, I don't see why anyone would give that degree of control to some unknown person who may or may not even exist. Jun 29 06 06:12 pm Link Sian Louise wrote: Well shit, I can do that. Jun 29 06 06:20 pm Link Sian Louise wrote: Sian Louise wrote: Wait a sec. You don't do porn? Why? Because of *morality* issues? And what the heck do you mean by "inappropriate"? You mean inappropriate according to the *morality police*? Or just inappropriate by contemporary community cultural standards (as determined by a jury)? Or is inappropriate just one of those terms that everyone agrees on? Jun 29 06 06:28 pm Link Dave Krueger wrote: If you are talking about the loopholes closed by the recent changes, I do not know of any group that would challenge them. I know the bookkeeping changes are under challenge, but the other aspects (eliminating the loophole of never producing a real image) no one is arguing. Jun 30 06 06:40 am Link Sian Louise wrote: Good lighting that fills in any shadows that would normally fall on the side of the nose or along the sides of the mouth (smile lines). Jun 30 06 02:56 pm Link Dave Krueger wrote: Sian Louise wrote: Wait a sec. You don't do porn? Why? Because of *morality* issues? And what the heck do you mean by "inappropriate"? You mean inappropriate according to the *morality police*? Or just inappropriate by contemporary community cultural standards (as determined by a jury)? Or is inappropriate just one of those terms that everyone agrees on? you're funny. i laugh at you because you really are funny. this hijack isn't appropriate though. this thread was in responce to many cropping up about lies and age and agencies... my images have been changed today so you won't even see the ones i was talking about. Jun 30 06 03:07 pm Link Kalika wrote: Yeah, I would definetly have to check your id and possibly through ncic just for reassurance lol Jun 30 06 03:10 pm Link what is ncic? Jun 30 06 03:12 pm Link Jim Ball wrote: Those laws, including the entire portion of the CDA mandating it, have been routinely struck down. Jun 30 06 06:07 pm Link And BTW Sian, I'm hurt, you never responded to the nice tag I left you Jun 30 06 06:12 pm Link Sian Louise wrote: (sounding silent alarm) uh, you didn't tell us that hostages were involved ... Jun 30 06 06:18 pm Link Sian Louise wrote: Who messed with your cookies when you were younger ? Jun 30 06 10:29 pm Link SLE Photography wrote: Where (which branch of the courts) and when were they struck down? I hadn't heard that. My original post was intended to help prevent someone from inadvertently running afoul of the law. Jun 30 06 10:40 pm Link NCIC is hte national crime information center. its where cops (read already busy 911 dispatchers) can run anything from people to Bulldozers to see if they are wanted or stolen etc. Done on computer and is pretty fast. Some cops can do it from thier cars if equipped. Each state has its own state version which is where the info is entered into the system. Ga's is called GCIC, etc. I was a cop/911 dispatcher for 10 yrs. At least I think thats what was mentioned. Jul 01 06 12:34 am Link Colonial Photography wrote: thanks i reckon there must be something similar in the uk. but we have a thing called a cbr - criminal buero records or something like that... you pay a fee and get your criminal record checked out... so people can tell if you are fit and able to work with youngsters or vulnerable adults. i don't have one because i'm not a nurse or anything and also the fact that i'm so young... most convictions that occur before the age of 18 become spent under the rehabilitation act once the child becomes an adult - so the 12 year old shoplifter who stole a mars bar or something doesnt remain a theif for the rest of their life. but either way i've never been arrested... a cop once offered me a ride hom late at night but i kindly said to him it'd be a lot more dangerhouse if i got home in a po-lice car then by walking... which was kinda true. Jul 01 06 04:18 am Link |