Model

Tinkaa

Posts: 65

Los Angeles, California, US

know its kinda lame to ask
but how can this picture be better?  i think it has some potential but now i just dont like it...

thankyou,thank you thank you!!!

https://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z320/tinkaargh/_M7O9722_7-1.jpg

https://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z320/tinkaargh/_M7O9723_7.jpg

Jan 12 10 07:57 am Link

Retoucher

The Photoshop Junkie

Posts: 300

New York, New York, US

remove all the umbrellas in the background

Jan 12 10 08:01 am Link

Photographer

Robert T Photography

Posts: 171

Highland Park, Illinois, US

IMO, the problem is the quality light on the model. That can not be undone.

Jan 12 10 08:08 am Link

Photographer

picturephoto

Posts: 8687

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Tinkaa wrote:
know its kinda lame to ask
but how can this picture be better?  i think it has some potential but now i just dont like it...

thankyou,thank you thank you!!!

https://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z320/tinkaargh/_M7O9722_7-1.jpg

https://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z320/tinkaargh/_M7O9723_7.jpg

The Photoshop Junkie wrote:
remove all the umbrellas in the background

The shots are what they are, and I'm not sure any kind of retouching will make much of a difference.  Removing the umbrellas is not a bad idea, but it's the kind of fine-tuning that does nothing to improve the fundamentals of the shots that, in my opinion, are more problematic (concept, how it's shot, wardrobe/makeup/hair, etc.).  This isn't a critique forum, but you get the idea.

Jan 12 10 08:11 am Link

Photographer

Liquid Shutter

Posts: 167

Tempe, Arizona, US

hmmm...first off, I would have posed you different. It looks like you have an amputated leg.

As for the PS, I would play up the flare in a golden color. Make it more exagerated

(and remove umbrellas)

Jan 12 10 08:12 am Link

Photographer

Wolfy4u

Posts: 1103

Grand Junction, Colorado, US

Unfortunately, I think you should have been shot from a slightly different angle eliminating the umbrellas, lens flair and the very large area of blown out white. An ocean background including some of the buildings would have been more interesting. The white area and the color of the umbrellas are very distracting. All these things have to do with the photographer not you. I do think, though, that a warmer expression would have caught the eye of the viewer more.

Jan 12 10 08:19 am Link

Retoucher

Peano

Posts: 4106

Lynchburg, Virginia, US

Tinkaa wrote:
know its kinda lame to ask
but how can this picture be better?

The question "better for what?" comes to mind (and I don't mean that in a snarky way at all). For some uses, you could just punt and go surreal, like maybe some sort of night/day blend in this mode ... I went this route because it bleeps out most of the distracting elements -- the blown sand, lens flares, umbrellas, etc.

https://img22.imageshack.us/img22/8648/surrealg.jpg

Jan 12 10 09:56 am Link

Retoucher

David reTouch

Posts: 6

Craigavon, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

What about this?

https://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt118/davidkennedyphotos/_M7O9723_7_retouch.jpg

Jan 12 10 11:29 am Link

Digital Artist

Koray

Posts: 6720

Ankara, Ankara, Turkey

good job removing the umbrellas Dave.

Jan 12 10 11:36 am Link

Retoucher

David reTouch

Posts: 6

Craigavon, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Koray wrote:
good job removing the umbrellas Dave.

Thanks!

Jan 12 10 11:50 am Link

Photographer

MisterC

Posts: 15162

Portland, Oregon, US

https://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o135/CWS_album/Tinkaa.jpg

Jan 12 10 11:58 am Link

Photographer

StephenEastwood

Posts: 19585

Great Neck, New York, US

not sure how the color is, I am on a laptop in a car (talk about bad glare sad )

But I would go more for 60's  mood like this.

https://www.stepheneastwood.com/mm/Untitled-_1.jpg


and I would clean some of the stuff off you leg as well.  Trackpads are not great at that.


Stephen Eastwood
http://www.NYPhotographics.com

Jan 12 10 12:12 pm Link

Retoucher

Michael Brittain

Posts: 2214

Wahiawa, Hawaii, US

I'd blow out the background with some bokeh as well....

Jan 12 10 03:38 pm Link

Retoucher

Gavin Retouch

Posts: 73

Phoenix, Arizona, US

https://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c189/CRXobsession/4yq8390d.jpg

Jan 12 10 04:16 pm Link

Photographer

By Jessica Nieto

Posts: 269

Carlsbad, California, US

cool

Mar 02 10 08:06 am Link

Photographer

FlirtynFun Photography

Posts: 13926

Houston, Texas, US

StephenEastwood wrote:
not sure how the color is, I am on a laptop in a car (talk about bad glare sad )

But I would go more for 60's  mood like this.

https://www.stepheneastwood.com/mm/Untitled-_1.jpg


and I would clean some of the stuff off you leg as well.  Trackpads are not great at that.


Stephen Eastwood
http://www.NYPhotographics.com

leave it to Eastwood to show everyone up while driving with a laptop...LMAO

Mar 02 10 08:09 am Link

Photographer

TouchofEleganceStudios

Posts: 5480

Vallejo, California, US

FlirtynFun Photography wrote:

leave it to Eastwood to show everyone up while driving with a laptop...LMAO

Oh, just great. Now we are going to have photographers and models editing photos on their laptops as they drive. And they were complaining about texting while you drive.


"But, officer why can Stephen Eastwood do it. What because of Eastwood Insurance smile"

Mar 02 10 08:15 am Link

Photographer

DevilsTowerMedia

Posts: 295

Douglasville, Georgia, US

The main problem with the OP's original photo is that the model is not properly in focus.  The second has to do with lighting issues (lens flare is acceptable only in a narrow spectrum of shots).  Because the lighting was not properly controlled, there are aspects that are burnt and blow-out.

It is far easier to control lighting on the front end, than to edit out the effects of improperly controlled physics.

Eastwood's reprisal of it is exceptional.

Mar 02 10 08:26 am Link

Photographer

New Dawn Photography

Posts: 3015

San Ramon, California, US

https://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu215/NewDawnPhotography/_M7O9723_7B.jpg?t=1267632310

or

https://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu215/NewDawnPhotography/_M7O9723_7c.jpg?t=1267632516

Mar 03 10 08:09 am Link

Retoucher

ZARIHS RETOUCHER

Posts: 3022

Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

https://img8.imageshack.us/img8/5637/38184334.jpg

Mar 03 10 01:56 pm Link

Photographer

shawn is boring

Posts: 1293

Long Beach, California, US

Richard Dubois wrote:

Tinkaa wrote:
know its kinda lame to ask
but how can this picture be better?  i think it has some potential but now i just dont like it...

thankyou,thank you thank you!!!

https://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z320/tinkaargh/_M7O9722_7-1.jpg

https://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z320/tinkaargh/_M7O9723_7.jpg

The shots are what they are, and I'm not sure any kind of retouching will make much of a difference.  Removing the umbrellas is not a bad idea, but it's the kind of fine-tuning that does nothing to improve the fundamentals of the shots that, in my opinion, are more problematic (concept, how it's shot, wardrobe/makeup/hair, etc.).  This isn't a critique forum, but you get the idea.

Nothing wrong with the concept, its poorly light to the point where saving it will require sourcing material from other photos.

Mar 04 10 01:18 pm Link

Retoucher

J Strath

Posts: 928

Los Angeles, California, US

StephenEastwood wrote:
not sure how the color is, I am on a laptop in a car (talk about bad glare sad )

But I would go more for 60's  mood like this.

https://www.stepheneastwood.com/mm/Untitled-_1.jpg


and I would clean some of the stuff off you leg as well.  Trackpads are not great at that.


Stephen Eastwood
http://www.NYPhotographics.com

Oh my god!!!!!  I'm just obsessed with the added rainbow effect!  That's beautiful!!!!  Really adds to the mood!!!!

Mar 04 10 01:33 pm Link

Photographer

shawn is boring

Posts: 1293

Long Beach, California, US

old school, is how I alway do images with blown highlights.

https://i46.tinypic.com/2ajvu3m.jpg

Mar 04 10 01:44 pm Link